The Netherlands is preparing for the United States to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court in the latest escalation of the Trump administration’s attacks on the global tribunal.
The Netherlands is looking at ways to help the court maintain payments to staff and to protected witnesses, and to ensure that security at the detention facility is not disrupted. Washington has already sanctioned more than a dozen current and former staff members, including half of the court’s sitting judges, in what Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described as a “sweeping campaign to dismantle the threat posed by the International Criminal Court. The court has issued arrest warrants for top Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, over the war in Gaza. Netanyahu and Israel strongly deny the allegations. Typically reserved for autocrats, terrorists and cartels, sanctions can be devastating. They could prevent the court from accessing financial and IT services, and even paying its U.S. employees. The United States, along with other major global powers including Russia, China and India, is not a member. The ICC has been preparing for months for the possibility of sanctions. It has also changed insurance and other financial providers to companies without a footprint in the United States.
The sanctions are retaliation for the court’s investigations of officials from the U.S. and Israel, which aren’t among the Hague-based court’s 125 member states. When the court’s former chief prosecutor was sanctioned in 2025, he lost access to his Microsoft email, his bank accounts were frozen and he was barred from entering the United States. U.S. officials warned their Dutch counterparts that sanctions would be levied as early as Monday (September 21, 2026) and encouraged the court’s host state to withdraw from the institution, according to two sources familiar with the situation.
Earlier this year, the court migrated off Microsoft products onto a German software provider, according to three ICC staff members who were not authorised to speak on the record.
