Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke on Tuesday quipped at the Supreme Court over its remarks on the recent protests in Delhi, wherein Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said the law and order situation was “not his domain.”
Because both the CJI and the Supreme Court have recently said that law and order is not the responsibility of the court, “I would not like to comment on that right now. The CJP founder thereafter questioned whether the SC would “tell Narendra Modi the same thing. What action have they taken against the Election Commission? They have taken no action at all,” PTI news agency cited Dipke as saying. The CJP founder further added, “We saw what happened in Bengal after votes were deleted. What did they say? Will the Supreme Court tell Narendra Modi the same thing, that he should not contest the election this time and can contest the next time? We will find your replacement who can handle it. To be sure, this post was subsequently deleted.
The CJP founder further questioned the top court, claiming “inaction” against the Election Commission of India. Dipke said he would “not like to comment” on Congress’s Kerala unit’s post against the Chief Justice of India. Dipke claimed that the top court had, during the SIR in West Bengal, said “it was fine if people could not vote now; they could vote later. Dipke highlighted the CJI’s remarks that law and order were not the “domain” of the Supreme Court. They said it was fine if people could not vote now; they could vote later. However, the CJI had asserted hat the “doors of the Supreme Court are open for everybody”, whether it be civilians or lawmakers. Following the remark, Indian National Congress’s Kerala unit, in a post on X which addressed the CJI as “Dear Surya Kant”, said, ““If law and order is not your domain, resign now.
However, the poll body has maintained that the three-member poll panel took all decisions, including those related to the SIR, unanimously. Protests against the SIR and Gyanesh Kumar ensued, with student organisations and opposition parties seeking the Chief Election Commissioner’s resignation. The row over the special intensive revision (SIR) exercise escalated after an Indian Express report said Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had raised objections on at least 14 occasions over 10 months to decisions and orders of the poll body, some of which they reportedly said were issued without their knowledge.
