The reasons behind it — and what has filled the vacuum since — say a great deal about where India-Bangladesh ties stand today. Bangladesh Prime Minister Tarique Rahman was expected in Delhi for three days from August 23rd. That visit has been postponed .
At its core, this is the tragic short-sightedness of an under-confident Dhaka establishment prone to imagining threats that don’t exist. It has damaged what was an honest, pragmatic attempt to rebuild ties on a durable, mutually beneficial footing. Ahead of the cancelled visit, a top aide to Rahman signalled openness to a so-called ‘Islamic NATO’. At the same time, Dhaka separately demanded India extradite former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina for trial. None of this happens in isolation from India’s own defences. The so-called chicken’s neck can, if needed, be widened into an elephant’s neck, with artillery, air power and missile cover already in place.
Neither helps reset a relationship India has invested in since Bangladesh’s birth in 1971 — from diesel and onions to vaccines during the pandemic. Home Minister Amit Shah has announced a triangular security grid for the Siliguri Corridor — the 60-km, 21-km-at-its-narrowest strip linking the mainland to the Northeast. New military stations are coming up at Kishanganj (Bihar, at the corridor’s mouth), Chopra (West Bengal, at its centre, facing Bangladesh’s Rajshahi district) and Dhubri (Assam), backed by the Hashimara air base, the 17 Strike Corps at Panagarh and the 33 Corps at Siliguri. An underground rail-and-road network — 35 km of railway already cleared, with tunnel-based ammunition depots to follow — will reinforce the grid further.
Both Washington and Beijing have played roles in Dhaka since Hasina’s exit — the Yunus-led interim government leaned West, and Chinese influence has grown since. India, by contrast, bailed out Sri Lanka’s economy, supplied drinking water to the Maldives, sent vaccines to Bangladesh and aided Nepal too — support without strings, unlike the transactional plays of other powers.
India has told both powers plainly that such interference is counterproductive, pointing to precedents in Nepal, Sri Lanka’s Hambantota and the Maldives.
