It is not the case of the petitioner that he has, in any manner, been: A practical reader guide

It is not the case of the petitioner that he has, in any manner, been: A practical reader guide

The Delhi high court has held that immigration officers are empowered to detain a person for further questioning and to subject them to additional security checks, even if they hold a valid visa and have travelled to the country on multiple occasions.

The order was passed by a bench of Justice Amit Mahajan while hearing a petition filed by an Indian citizen holding a valid German Business Schengen visa, who alleged that he was repeatedly subjected to additional scrutiny at the departure and arrival immigration counters at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport despite possessing valid travel documents.

“Pertinently, the Immigration officer is well within its authority to seek information as is necessary. In fact, Section 3 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 empowers the Immigration officer to require the traveller to furnish such information as may be necessary and appropriate,” the court said in an October 14 order released later. Taking note of the Centre’s submissions, the court dismissed the petition, observing that the mere fact that the petitioner was subjected to additional verification due to the earlier annulment of his visa, causing him some inconvenience, was not sufficient to warrant the court’s interference.

“It cannot be held that the authorities were arbitrarily exercising their powers.

It is not the case of the petitioner that he has, in any manner, been prevented to travel abroad or that he has not been allowed to depart after his examination by the immigration authorities,” the court said.