CARA referral doesn’t give enforceable right to adopt child if: A practical reader guide

K'taka: Three arrested for gang-rape of tribal woman from West Bengal

The Delhi high court has held that prospective adoptive parents (PAPs) do not acquire an enforceable right to adopt a child merely by accepting the referral and having the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) process their application for a no-objection certificate (NOC), if they are legally ineligible to adopt.

The court was hearing a plea by a Singapore resident challenging CARA’s March 2026 decision to reject his inter-country adoption application, despite his acceptance of the authority’s referral of a baby girl.

“In the opinion of this Court, an expectation which is founded upon some actions of the authority done in contravention of the statutory regulations, though later corrected before issuance of NOC and passing of final order, cannot be said to be founded on the sanction of law, and therefore, cannot be termed a legitimate‘ expectation in law neither the referral of Baby K to the petitioner and its acceptance by him, nor the subsequent conduct of CARA in processing the application for issuance of the NOC, conferred any vested or enforceable right upon the petitioner to seek adoption of a child for whose adoption he was statutorily ineligible,” a bench of justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said in October 15 verdict, released on Friday.

The man and his wife had registered as prospective adoptive parents under the Non-Resident Indian category on CARA’s CARINGS portal. In January, CARA referred a girl child to them. The couple subsequently submitted and re-submitted the documents required for issuance of a no-objection certificate (NOC), including a power of attorney, family photographs, birth certificates of their biological children and a consent letter from their elder son. However, CARA rejected their application. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition but issued directions to CARA to implement in coordination with the concerned Specialised Adoption Agencies, State Adoption Resource Agencies, authorised foreign adoption agencies and Indian diplomatic missions, wherever applicable. Additionally, it asked CARA to adhere to the timeline prescribed and also ensure that the application status on the designated portal accurately reflects the action taken, along with brief reasons.

CARA’s lawyer argued that the man was found ineligible under Regulation 5(7) of the Adoption Regulations, 2022, as per which couples with two or more children shall only be considered for special needs children and hard-to-place children.

An application must not be marked as “withdrawn” unless the PAPs have specifically withdrawn it, the court directed.