The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition filed by two voters whose names were deleted from the electoral rolls after they could not complete the enumeration process during ongoing the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in the Capital, terming their apprehension of being accused of making a false declaration while submitting Form 6 as “misplaced”.
It requires an applicant to fill in their personal particulars. However, applicants are also required to affirm that they are applying for inclusion in the electoral roll for the first time. It further brings to the applicant’s attention that giving a false declaration can attract penal consequences.
Also Read I SIR row: Amit Shah says ‘Congress losing since decades’; Oppn party flags ‘heights of irony’ Form 6 is the statutory application for fresh inclusion in the electoral roll.
Dismissing the petition, a bench of justices Dinesh Mehta and Aditi Chaudhary, in an October 14 order, said that given that the “suggestion is coming from the learned standing counsel appearing for ECI, that too as per the instructions of the Electoral Registration Officer”, the petitioner’s “apprehension is…misplaced”.
They urged the court to direct the ECI to revise the procedure for existing voters who could not complete enumeration, to be able to restore their names in the electoral rolls through Form 8, required for those who want to update their voter ID or electoral roll details, instead of through fresh entries using Form 6. ECI’s lawyer, Sanjay Vashishtha, submitted that the petitioners’ grievances could be addressed if they filled out Form 6, as prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The voter argued that submitting Form 6 would amount to making a false declaration. Petitioners, if so desired, may fill Form 6, which shall be processed in accordance with law.”
Because they had shifted out of their old addresses, in their petition, the two voters said they were not able to fill their enumeration forms.
Taking note of ECI’s stand, the court said, in its order, “With these observations, the writ proceedings are closed.
