The court also asked the Centre to consider introducing nutritional education in schools to help children understand food labels and make informed dietary choices.
The Supreme Court has put the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India’s (FSSAI) two-phase rollout of front-of-pack warning labels (FoPL) under the scanner, warning that the second phase could be “indefinitely postponed” in the absence of a clear timeline.
Under the proposed rollout, warnings would initially apply to packaged foods high in two or more nutrients of concern — added fat, added sugar and salt — and would be extended in the second phase to products high in even one of them. The FSSAI had proposed the phased approach to give consumers time to adapt to the new labels and the food industry time to reformulate its products. “Assessment of consumer acceptability or giving the industry adequate time for reformulation cannot be reason enough for this uncertainty in time. Pardiwala and K. It accordingly asked the FSSAI to consider an alternative model, under which products with the highest levels of nutrients of concern would be brought under the warning regime first, followed by those with progressively lower thresholds. The top court passed the directions while hearing a PIL filed by non-profit 3S and Our Health Society, represented by advocate Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, seeking mandatory front-of-pack warnings on packaged foods high in sugar, salt and saturated fats. The court also questioned why a warning should initially require a product to be high in at least two nutrients of concern when excess levels of even one could pose health risks. It noted the petitioners’ contention that the two-nutrient requirement lacked scientific basis and would leave many products outside the first phase. The Bench also took note of concerns raised by stakeholders against placing ultra-processed foods on the same footing as minimally processed packaged foods, given the greater nutritional benefits of the latter. It accordingly asked the regulator to consider whether different thresholds could be formulated based on the degree of processing. The order also raised questions about the design of the proposed warning labels. “Ideally, an all-inclusive FoPL which effectively caters to the diverse population of this country should incorporate a combination of words along with pictorial representations of the individual nutrients-of-concern. “We are concerned with the health of people, more particularly growing children. We have taken it up very seriously…
Vinod Chandran said in an order passed on Thursday (September 10, 2026) night. The court directed the FSSAI to file an affidavit within 10 days setting out its responses and clarifications on the concerns raised and posted the matter for further hearing on September 28. Therefore, a reasonable, scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline or transitionary period which divides the two-phases must be indicated, for the approach of the FSSAI to be a workable one,” a Bench comprising Justices J.B.
Acknowledging that children are particularly “vulnerable” to “impulse or uninformed dietary decision-making”, the Bench also asked the Union government to incorporate nutritional literacy into school curricula, including teaching children how to interpret nutritional information and front-of-pack labels. The FSSAI was further asked to clarify which “specified sweetened beverages” would be covered in the first phase and the thresholds that would apply to them. The FSSAI has proposed a red hexagon carrying warnings such as “HIGH FAT”, “HIGH SUGAR” and “HIGH SALT”, but the court flagged that there was “insufficient information” on its size and placement. It also pointed out that a “strictly word-based warning label” presupposes a certain level of comprehension and literacy among consumers, potentially limiting its accessibility across regions, languages and age groups. This would ensure that the information provided in the FoPL is truly accessible”, the Bench said. the Bench cautioned that reducing salt, sugar and fat in packaged foods could have the “unintended and unfortunate consequence” of prompting manufacturers to increase their use of artificial preservatives, emulsifiers and other additives to preserve taste, texture and shelf life While acknowledging that the FSSAI had made “significant progress” in implementing its directions on warning labels. It accordingly asked the regulator to “keep this danger in mind” while finalising the threshold limits and considering corresponding regulations governing the addition of such chemicals to packaged foods. Earlier, the top court had asked the regulator to take its directions “seriously”, stressing its concern over the impact of food safety standards on public health, particularly that of growing children. We expect one and all to extend cooperation in a cause which is in national interest,” Justice Pardiwala had said.
The order came a day after Additional Solicitor General Brijender Chahar, appearing for the Centre and the FSSAI, told the court that it was open to making warning labels mandatory for packaged foods high in even one nutrient of concern — sugar, salt or fat — marking a regulatory pivot from the earlier proposal to trigger warnings only when a product exceeded limits for two or more such nutrients. Earlier reporting noted: In a detailed order passed on Thursday night, a bench of justices JB Pardiwala and K Vinod Chandran said children were particularly vulnerable to “impulse or uninformed dietary decision-making” and asked the Union government to explain how schools could incorporate nutritional literacy through curriculum, initiatives and workshops, including teaching children how to interpret nutritional information and FoPL on packaged foods. Earlier reporting noted: The court questioned the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) over its proposal to introduce the warnings in two phases — initially for packaged foods high in two or more nutrients of concern and later for products high in any one of them, saying the absence of a fixed timeline could result in the second phase being “indefinitely postponed”.
Earlier reporting noted: SC asks govt to teach nutrition in schools, quizzes FSSAI on food warning labels The Supreme Court has put the Centre on notice over introducing nutritional education in schools to help children understand food labels and make informed dietary choices, while seeking a detailed response from the food regulator on almost every aspect of its proposed front-of-pack warning labels (FoPL), including their size, font, placement, colour and timeline for implementation.
