Days after the NALSAR students controversy, a group of lawyers on Thursday (August 20, 2026) staged a protest outside the office of the Bar Council of India (BCI) demanding the resignation of BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra.
Heavy police presence was deployed near the BCI office in view of the demonstration, which was called by the All India Young Advocates Association and supported by the Cockroach Janta Party. After criticism, the BCI later withdrew the proceedings, saying most students were innocent. The episode also raised concerns over the BCI’s power to impose a blanket enrolment freeze on an entire graduating batch. He accused Mr. “Name one thing the BCI Chairman has done for the welfare of law students or lawyers… Lawyers are attacked daily and are being murdered inside police stations. Recently, a senior lawyer died in Hyderabad. Did he issue any official statement regarding that? Mr.
The protest began after the Bar Council of India (BCI) on August 13 ordered State Bar Councils not to enrol Hyderabad’s NALSAR varsity’s 2026 graduating batch, following a student campaign over recent judicial developments and the invitation to CJI Surya Kant to their convocation. Lawyers stage a protest against the Chairman of Bar Council of India outside BCI office in New Delhi on August 20, 2026. | Photo Credit: Shashi Shekhar Kashyap Another demonstrator, Advocate Umesh Kumar, held the Constitution in his hand and questioned the Chairman’s record on lawyer welfare, pointing out that crime against lawyers is a common occurrence. There are claims that 35% to 40% of the people in this profession are fake lawyers.”
CJI Kant subsequently termed the BCI order “absolutely unnecessary”, and upheld the students’ right to protest and barred punitive action against NALSAR students or faculty. Mishra of spearheading “political agendas” while staying silent on issues of lawyers. He remains silent when it comes to our welfare, yet he is always at the forefront of advancing political agendas–often misusing official BCI letters to do so,” he said. Kumar said the protest’s core demands centred on structural issues within the profession, stating, “The issues here concern lawyer welfare, the Advocates Act, stipends, chambers, our well-being, and the need for control over law colleges-especially regarding fake law colleges and degrees.
