On July 27, 2026, the apex court had taken on record the Uttar Pradesh government’s office memorandum

On July 27, 2026, the apex court had taken on record the Uttar Pradesh government’s office memorandum

The Supreme Court on Monday (August 17, 2026) conveyed a hands-off approach on the investigation into the Ram Temple donations’ misappropriation case, saying a Special Investigation Team (SIT) is expected to take the probe to its logical conclusion, and anyone with further suggestions could approach the office of the Solicitor General of India directly.

“Let the SIT conclude. They must take it to its logical conclusion,” Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, heading a three-judge Bench, addressed petitioners and intervenors. On July 27, 2026, the apex court had taken on record the Uttar Pradesh government’s office memorandum of July 25, constituting the SIT chaired by Kiran S., Inspector General of Police, Lucknow Range, Lucknow. The other members of the SIT, as recorded in the July 27 order, include Somen Barma, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ayodhya Range; Gaurav Grover, Senior Superintendent of Police, Ayodhya district; and Ritesh Kumar Singh, Additional Superintendent of Police, Barabanki district.

Mr.

Mehta, appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh, said the “donations are being maintained”. The petitioners and any other “ bona fide persons” could approach the office of Mr. Mehta with their suggestions if they felt “any aspects need to be thoroughly investigated by the SIT”, the court said, and these suggestions or aspects would be “objectively considered” by the top law officer’s office and passed on to the SIT.

Petitioners complained that even the contents of the First Investigation Report (FIR) on the misappropriation of funds managed by the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust had not been shown, while others flagged that the data on donations needed to be revealed. The State confirmed the inclusion of a forensic auditor as the nature of the investigation involved allegations of misappropriation of Trust funds. The Akhara argued that the present Trust lacked proper accountability, and the 2019 Ayodhya verdict regarding its representation in the Trust had not been implemented.

The Nirmohi Akhara, represented by senior advocate Sushil Jain, urged the court to hear its application for the restructuring of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust into a public trust.

“We are also concerned how donations are to be maintained,” one of them said. The present hearings were only concerned with the investigation into the allegations of misappropriation, the court said. The Bench said the Akhara could raise the issue separately.