A review in 2012 concluded that the most sedentary were more than twice as likely as the least to have or develop diabetes, and also faced a much higher risk of premature death. PROLONGED SITTING rightly has a bad rap. Three years after that an analysis of news articles in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found hundreds of pieces that referred to claims likening sitting to smoking.
Another, in 2015, found that sitting for long stretches was associated with “deleterious health outcomes regardless of physical activity”.
Nor are the cardiovascular gains impressive. Body fat and blood-sugar control improved slightly, but blood pressure, insulin, cholesterol and triglycerides did not. The study did not, however, look at blood flow and the activation of postural muscles, both factors which might contribute to the benefits of standing over sitting. What matters far more is movement. Some findings are encouraging. Consider a trial at Georgia Southern University. Energy expenditure on the ball was similar to normal sitting. A longer trial found another benefit. They reckoned it reduced fatiguing muscle contractions and improved blood flow to compressed tissues.
An analysis in 2018 found standing at a desk burned just nine more calories per hour than sitting. A review in 2020 pooled nine trials involving 877 people. Participants stood about 1.3 hours more a day and were followed for roughly four months. A study in the International Journal of Epidemiology in 2024 crunched data on 83,013 adults in Britain followed for an average of nearly seven years. A study of nearly 482,000 Taiwanese adults in 2024 found that just 15–30 minutes of extra daily exercise could erase most of the excess mortality risk associated with sitting at work. Researchers had 20 adults perform short reading and typing tasks on an ordinary chair, an exercise ball and a seat mounted on top of an inflatable bladder. But on the bladder, participants’ heart rates and calorie burn rose by 6–13% and 19–40% respectively. Writing in Ergonomics in 2019, the researchers attributed this to muscle contractions required to maintain balance. For six months 133 office workers in Bangkok sat on either a foam seat pad or a slightly unstable inflatable one designed to encourage frequent postural changes. Those using the latter were 81% and 84% less likely to develop neck and lower-back pain, respectively.
Because of pooling of blood in the legs, those who stood for more than two hours a day had a higher risk of varicose veins and venous ulcers, perhaps. Desk-bound workers may therefore wonder if active seating can make a difference.
That said, standing can have downsides. Writing in the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health in 2024, the researchers described the pad as a “light-exercise device”.
