The Supreme Court has registered a suo motu writ petition seeking contempt of court action against Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) for publishing a derogatory post against Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant.
The two associations had issued resolutions stating that such a statement borders on contempt as it undermines public confidence in the judiciary and amounts to interference in the administration of justice. Pursuant to this, SCBA joint secretary Meneesh Dubey had issued a legal notice to KPCC President Sunny Joseph on October 16 seeking response on the said post.
“The KPCC disapproves of and expressly disagrees with, censures the language employed in the post. The demand for resignation and the suggestion of finding a replacement for the CJI were inappropriate and should not have appeared on an official party platform,” it stated. Jindal’s letter urged the court to take suo motu cognisance of initiating criminal contempt on the post stating that the issue raises a larger question. He further states, “Legitimate criticism must be distinguished from conduct that may undermine the authority of the court or interfere with the administration of justice. The distinction must be assessed in the light of the language used, its context, the circumstances of publication and its actual or reasonably apprehended effect.
He brought to the court’s attention the reported political demonstration and slogan-shouting by Congress leaders and other Opposition leaders inside the Supreme Court premises on October 12 when Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi along with other political party leaders came with a large gathering of lawyers to file their petition challenging the special intensive revision (SIR) and the functioning of Election Commission of India posing a security threat within the court’s precincts.
Joseph in his reply said, “Neither I nor the leadership had authorised him to demand the resignation of the CJI or to suggest that the organisation would find a replacement. Though it admitted that the official account of the party was used for such an “unauthorised communication”, it stated that it does not establish that its contents were approved by the leadership. Thottathil has since been removed from the position and he has been called upon to issue a public apology for the said publication, the response further stated. Jindal said, “The office of the Chief Justice of India is a constitutional judicial office and cannot be treated as one whose continuance is subject to the approval or displeasure of any political organisation.
Subsequently, on October 22, KPCC president responded to the legal notice and said the post was published by one Vijay Thottathil of the KPCC media cell “without the prior knowledge, approval or consultation of the KPCC leadership”.
